I actually think the Pac 10 is better this year than most or at least more equal.
Printable View
I actually think the Pac 10 is better this year than most or at least more equal.
4 of their 10 teams have losing records....I don't think so.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sup-rbeast</div><div class="ubbcode-body">4 of their 10 teams have losing records....I don't think so. </div></div>
Didnt Cal lose to a Pac 10 team though, just like USC did, whereas both of them won all of their non conference games? Auburn couldnt even win the big east. Please let it go.
And I guess by that logic, UGA beat Oklahoma state who beat Nebraska as bad as USC did (in thier ony "good" win of the year), so UGA should be ranked right with Southern Cal cuz UGA has not lost to a team as lowly as Stanford..Lol...the way I see it, anyone in the SEC could and prolly would win the Big East...Auburn lost to USF..but so did WV..and when someone knocks off the Bulls the Big East is wide open again. We can put it this way...there are maybe 3 teams in the nation that can beat Florida...and 2 of em play next week in Baton Rouge..lol. AU is prolly the 4th or 5th best SEC team overall..and they lost to the class of the Big East this year. SC and UNC is a rivarly..without a late mistake, SC wins by 12, UK beat an overly hyped Louisville team..and when it's all said and done UK is prolly the 6th best team in the SEC. And unlike the other conferences, cellar dwellers don't knock off the top teams in the SEC. It's alot like Bowl time...the sec has 6 or 7 tie ins not including BCS games. In those games you can look at the way the games are set up, SEC teams play a higher seeded team from other conferences in 5 of em...in an effort to create a mismatch and a decent game. No need to be sore just because the Pac 10 and ACC suck monkey balls this year.
for real, everyone already knows how good the SEC is, but the pac-10 is the next best conference in football.
I think the big 12 is better than the Pac 10.
I wouldn't go that far.
Top to bottom I would.
I still think that the Big 12 is really weak. To me, year in and year out they have been one of the weakest BCS conferences since 01 or so.
Me too...but didn't matter in 04 when Oklahoma was chosen to play USC over Auburn. But I think Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri and K-State are better year in and year out than USC, Oregon, Cal, and UCLA...out of what is left, the Big 12 still has Texas Tech and Nebraska who are both better than anything the Pac 10 has left to offer.